Biden donates weapons to Taiwan and Ukraine.

Biden donates weapons to Taiwan and Ukraine.

America’s Decision to Arm Taiwan Raises Concerns and Questions

The recent announcement by the United States to start arming Taiwan from its own military stocks has caused a significant stir. This move, which is reminiscent of the continuous arms supplies to Ukraine in its fight against Russia, represents a departure from previous policies. Now, instead of just selling weapons to Taiwan, the US has decided to provide direct military support, citing the need to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait while deterring China’s aggressive actions. However, this bold decision comes with a lot of uncertainty and potential consequences.

China has expressed its strong objection to the arms supplies, labeling them as “malicious acts” that pose a serious threat to peace and stability in the region. It is highly likely that China will respond to this move by intensifying its military harassment of Taiwan, such as conducting more frequent incursions into Taiwanese airspace and territorial waters. This could further escalate tensions and increase the risk of a conflict.

The details of the arms package, valued at $345 million, have not been fully disclosed by the White House. However, leaks suggest that it includes anti-armour and anti-aircraft weapons, as well as MQ-9A surveillance drones. This initial assistance is expected to be followed by additional military aid, as the US intends to utilize the full $1 billion that has been authorized by Congress by the end of this fiscal year.

The announcement of this arms deal was deliberately downplayed by the administration, buried in legalese and released on a Friday, indicating some trepidation on the part of President Joe Biden’s team. They are mindful of the delicate balance between avoiding a crisis with China and satisfying the demands of Congress, especially Republicans who accuse Biden of being too soft on China.

Some argue that Biden delayed the Taiwan arms deal out of fear of upsetting China. However, the Biden administration vehemently rejects such claims, maintaining that they are committed to supporting Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities while seeking diplomatic channels to improve Sino-American relations. The absence of effective military-to-military communication between the two nations further complicates the situation.

• Bhutan’s job crisis leads to migration to Australia.
• August 2023’s Best Balance Transfer Credit Cards
• July 2023’s Best 1-Year CD Rates (Up to 5.51%)

Additionally, President Biden faces immense pressure to provide Ukraine with much-needed weapons as it continues to counter Russian aggression. Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelensky, has called for increased air-defense systems to protect against Russian attacks. Balancing the needs of both Ukraine and Taiwan within the constraints of an already strained relationship with China is an ongoing challenge for the Biden administration.

Historically, military supplies to Ukraine have come from American stocks, while Taiwan has purchased its arms through the Foreign Military Sales system. This development raises concerns about competition for limited resources and the potential overlap in weaponry provided to both nations. The current backlog of Taiwanese orders, amounting to over $14 billion, includes contracts for the Javelin missile and the Stinger, both of which have been supplied to Ukraine in large quantities.

Unlike the military aid provided to Ukraine through congressional appropriations, funds have not been specifically allocated for replenishing weapons given to Taiwan. While the Pentagon may be able to reallocate funds internally in the short term, sustaining the new Taiwan policy will require Congress to appropriate funds in the next fiscal year. This process is further complicated by the divided nature of Congress, especially the House, where proponents of “America First” policies favoring Donald Trump hold significant influence.

In conclusion, the decision by the United States to arm Taiwan from its own military stocks has far-reaching implications. It not only challenges China’s territorial claims and aspirations in the region but also puts the Biden administration in a delicate position, trying to balance its desire for diplomatic engagement with China while meeting the demands of Congress and supporting Ukraine’s ongoing struggle against Russian aggression. The path forward is full of challenges, requiring careful navigation and a comprehensive understanding of the complexities involved.