Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ law effectively bans AP Psychology in schools, says College Board.

Florida's 'Don't Say Gay' law effectively bans AP Psychology in schools, says College Board.

The Battle Over AP Psychology in Florida: A Clash of Education and Politics

In a clash between education and politics, the College Board has found itself in the midst of controversy once again. The Florida Department of Education is now requiring schools to omit discussions on gender and sexual identity in the Advanced Placement Psychology course. This move has prompted the College Board to issue a statement warning that any AP Psychology course taught in Florida would violate either state law or college requirements. The result? Florida districts are being advised to refrain from offering the course altogether until the decision is reversed.

Carrying the weight of a nationwide debate on education, the College Board’s decision to exclude AP Psychology from Florida schools is a blow to both students and educators in the state. The conflict began when the Florida Department of Education implemented regulations limiting discussions on gender identity and sexual orientation, instructing high-school teachers to follow Florida’s controversial Parental Rights in Education Law. While proponents of the law believe it grants parents greater oversight of their children’s education, critics argue that it harms LGBTQ+ students and teachers, depriving them of a comprehensive learning experience.

To add fuel to the fire, the scrutiny directed at the College Board doesn’t stop at AP Psychology. Governor Ron DeSantis previously criticized the College Board’s AP African American History course, leading to further tensions. The board responded by unveiling a framework for the course, drawing criticism from more than 800 African American Studies professors and educators. This clash reveals a deeper underlying tension between educational content and political interference, pointing to a struggle for control over curriculum and teaching methods.

The College Board, defending its position, highlights that discussions on sex and gender have been an integral part of the AP Psychology curriculum for the past 30 years. The coursework explicitly includes a section on how sex and gender influence socialization and various aspects of development. Furthermore, the College Board clarifies that it leaves the method of teaching these topics to the discretion of the teachers, dispelling concerns about a predetermined agenda.

Contrary to the College Board’s claim, the Florida Department of Education, as represented by Cassie Palelis, argues that the course has not been banned and remains listed in Florida’s Course Code Directory for the upcoming school year. Palelis urges the College Board to continue offering the course and allow teachers to operate according to their own judgment. It is clear that differing interpretations of the Florida Department of Education’s regulations have further complicated the situation, leaving both students and educators in a state of confusion.

• KKR in talks to buy Simon & Schuster for $1.65 bln
• China’s spy agencies target the ‘five poisons’ gl...
• Russian troops violated ‘military operations 101’ and w...

One vocal critic of the decision is State Representative Anna Eskamani, a Democrat, who vehemently denounces the loss of the AP Psychology course. Eskamani believes that this decision is politically motivated and will only serve to rob students of a well-rounded and college-ready education experience. As the battle rages on, Florida’s high school students find themselves caught in the crossfire, their educational opportunities now dictated by political maneuvering.

The clash between the College Board and the Florida Department of Education not only affects the students directly impacted by these decisions, but it also highlights the broader issue of educational autonomy versus political intervention. The question remains: who should determine the content and direction of our students’ education? As this conflict brews, educators, students, and advocates must ensure that a well-rounded and inclusive education experience is at the forefront, one that prepares young minds for the challenges of the future.