Interview with Ian Bremmer

Interview with Ian Bremmer

The Grave Warning of a Potential Brexit: A Risky Move for Britain


As the debate surrounding Britain’s potential exit from the European Union (EU) heats up, experts are weighing in on the risks and consequences of a “Brexit” vote. One such expert is Ian Bremmer, president of Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy, and a renowned foreign policy guru. In a recent interview, Bremmer issued a grave warning about the potential marginalization and negative impact on Britain’s global influence if the country were to leave the EU.

Bremmer’s first argument against Brexit is that it would further marginalize Britain as a power with influence. He believes that diplomatically, economically, and militarily, Britain’s position would be weakened. He points out that the United States already sees Germany as more important and relevant, leaving Britain in a less advantageous position. Furthermore, Bremmer argues that vital agreements, such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), would be severely impacted if Britain were to leave the EU. He emphasizes that the attractiveness of the British market would decrease significantly, and the uncertainty caused by Brexit would create major challenges for trade agreements and investment.

One counter-argument presented by Eurosceptics is that by leaving the EU, Britain would have more freedom to build better relationships with emerging markets and countries within the Commonwealth. Bremmer acknowledges the importance of such relationships but warns that the Brits should focus on strengthening ties with India, rather than obsessing over China. He suggests that Germany will always be the best European partner for China. Additionally, Bremmer points out that backing out of the EU and becoming a “second tier power” would undermine Britain’s attempts to attract Chinese attention and investment. He cautions against putting all of Britain’s eggs in the China basket, as it could prove to be dangerously short-sighted.

Those in favor of Brexit often argue that leaving the EU would allow Britain to escape the bureaucracy and regulation of an increasingly overbearing EU. However, Bremmer refutes this claim, noting that the EU’s influence over Britain is weak in reality. He believes that the EU is not stopping Britain from achieving its goals, and the perception of an “incredibly overbearing” EU is out of sync with the weak reality.

Another concern raised by Bremmer is the potential domino effect that Brexit could have on other EU countries. While Bremmer does not expect an immediate wave of countries leaving the EU, he suggests that Brexit would lead to other countries considering their own referendums. He believes the process would gather steam, although the difficulties and painful nature of leaving the EU would likely deter many countries from following suit.

In terms of Britain’s role on the global stage, Bremmer argues that staying in the EU would allow Britain to embrace a leadership role in a weakened Europe that needs Britain. He highlights the importance of Britain’s participation in shaping Europe’s future rather than isolating itself. On the other hand, if Britain were to leave the EU, Bremmer warns that the transatlantic relationship would be further hollowed out, with the United States shifting its focus towards the Pacific. This aligns with the Obama administration’s “pivot to Asia” strategy, which seeks to strengthen ties with like-minded countries in the Pacific region.

The warning of a potential Brexit extends beyond the interests of Britain itself. Bremmer emphasizes that the EU is weaker than ever, and Brexit would contribute to the continued deterioration of the transatlantic relationship. He argues that this weakened alliance is a pressing risk for global stability and cooperation.

In conclusion, Ian Bremmer’s insights serve as a serious cautionary note about the potential risks and consequences of a Brexit. His arguments highlight the negative impact on Britain’s influence, the potential disruption to trade agreements, and the wider implications for the transatlantic relationship. While there are valid arguments on both sides of the Brexit debate, Bremmer’s warning should be seriously considered when casting a vote on June 23rd.