Lawyer argues US troops could crush mass riots triggered by Trump’s power grab.
Lawyer argues US troops could crush mass riots triggered by Trump's power grab.
Trump’s Attempt to Remain in Power: The Indictment Unveils Startling Details
In a shocking revelation, the new indictment against former President Donald Trump provides an inside look at his desperate attempts to cling to power after losing the 2020 election. The document sheds light on conversations and actions taken by Trump and his allies during the tumultuous days leading up to the inauguration of President Joe Biden. While the original content provided a brief overview, we will delve deeper into these events, uncovering the emotional intensity, humor, and positive aspects of this historic episode.
The White House Lawyer’s Warning
Just days before Congress was set to certify Biden’s victory, one deputy White House counsel sat down with Trump to present a dire warning. He cautioned that if Trump remained in office on Inauguration Day, “there would be riots in every major city in the United States.” This shocking statement emphasizes the gravity of the situation and the potential social unrest that could have ensued.
Clark’s Suggestion: Call in the Troops
However, Jeffrey Clark, a top Justice Department lawyer and alleged co-conspirator in the indictment, responded with a contrasting suggestion. He pointed out the existence of the Insurrection Act, a law rarely invoked, which grants the US president the authority to deploy the military to quell internal disturbances. The indictment portrays Clark as a central figure in Trump’s scheme to overturn the election results and highlights his attempt to utilize the Insurrection Act as a means to that end.
Unveiling Trump’s Conspiracy
The indictment brings forth four criminal counts against Trump, accusing him of conspiring to prevent Congress from certifying the election results. While Trump is the primary defendant, the document also names six co-conspirators who supposedly assisted him in executing his plan. Co-conspirator 4, identified as a Justice Department official, is believed to be Clark, who held a prominent position in the Justice Department during the Trump administration. The indictment alleges that Clark exploited his role to initiate baseless election crime investigations and sway state legislatures using false claims of election fraud. These revelations shed light on the extent of Clark’s involvement in the conspiracy.
Clark’s Other Machinations
The indictment reveals additional activities undertaken by Clark during the same period when the Insurrection Act was suggested. Notably, Clark attempted to position himself as Acting Attorney General. He approached the Acting Attorney General at the time, Jeffrey Rosen, informing him of Trump’s desire to appoint him to the position. However, Rosen staunchly refused, leading to a meeting between Trump and Rosen. Ultimately, Trump abandoned his plan to appoint Clark as Acting Attorney General when confronted with the potential mass resignations it would trigger, both from the Justice Department and his own White House Counsel.
- The Chinese internet believes life is over at 35, not 60.
- Australians fight for permanent work-from-home rights
- Suspect in murder of SF tech exec Bob Lee to stand trial despite fa...
Clark’s Professional Repercussions
In the aftermath of these revelations, the DC Bar is considering revoking Clark’s law license due to his attempts to overturn the election results. This potential consequence illustrates the severity of the actions undertaken by Clark and his co-conspirators and emphasizes the professional repercussions they may face.
Congress Contemplates Altering the Insurrection Act
The indictment, brought forth by Justice Department Special Counsel Jack Smith, underscores the unprecedented assault on American democracy that occurred on January 6, 2021. Smith attributes this attack to lies propagated by Trump, aimed at obstructing the foundational process of collecting, counting, and certifying the presidential election results. Post-Trump era, some members of Congress entertained the idea of amending the Insurrection Act, fearing its potential misuse by the former president, especially as he eyes a return to the presidency in the 2024 election.
The Rumors Surrounding the Insurrection Act
Prior to Biden’s inauguration, a viral rumor suggested that he had secretly invoked the Insurrection Act as a last-ditch effort to retain power. Figures like Michael Flynn, a prominent conspiracy theorist and Trump’s former national security advisor, allegedly pressured Biden to use the act to seize voting machines. Even some Capitol rioters, including Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes, publicly implored Trump to invoke the law. While Trump had previously threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, he never followed through with his plans.
Trump’s Belated Acceptance of Defeat
Amidst his deliberations and meetings with lawyers, Trump had a discussion with Gen. Mark Milley about an overseas national security issue. However, Trump acknowledged that it was too late to address the matter, accepting that his presidency was coming to an end. He humorously remarked to Milley, “Yeah, you’re right, it’s too late for us. We’re going to give that to the next guy.” This anecdote illustrates Trump’s eventual resignation to the fact that he had truly lost the election and relinquished his authority to the incoming Biden administration.
The new indictment against Trump offers an unprecedented and revealing glimpse into his desperate attempts to retain power. It highlights the contrasting viewpoints of his advisors, the potential implications of invoking the Insurrection Act, and the severe consequences faced by those involved in the conspiracy. This historic episode serves as a testament to the resilience of American democracy and the importance of upholding the integrity of the electoral process.
