Top ANBLEs criticize Fitch’s bizarre and inept decision to downgrade America’s credit rating.

Top ANBLEs criticize Fitch's bizarre and inept decision to downgrade America's credit rating.

The Downgrade of U.S. Government Debt: What It Means and How It’s Being Received

In a statement, credit rating agency Fitch announced its decision to downgrade the United States’ credit rating. Their reasoning? The expected fiscal deterioration over the next three years, a high and growing debt burden, and the erosion of governance relative to ‘AA’ and ‘AAA’ rated peers over the last two decades. Fitch’s downgrade is unsurprising given the current state of affairs. As it stands, the U.S. national debt is a staggering $32.67 trillion, and Fitch predicts that it will continue to rise due to rising social security and Medicare costs stemming from an aging population. By 2025, Fitch expects the U.S. national debt burden to reach 118% of gross domestic product, a drastic difference compared to the 39% average for AAA-rated nations.

These sobering statistics are in line with the Congressional Budget Office’s projections, which estimate that the federal budget deficit will exceed $1.4 trillion this year, with annual deficits averaging $2 trillion between 2024 and 2033. Given this backdrop, Fitch’s downgrade was not unexpected. In fact, they placed the U.S.’s AAA credit rating on “negative watch” back in May during the debt ceiling debate, which was resolved just days before the so-called “X-date,” when the federal government would have exhausted its financial obligations.

Fitch argues that the repeated debt limit standoffs and last-minute resolutions have eroded confidence in the country’s fiscal management, deeming it necessary to lower the credit rating. The agency also warns of potential consequences, such as tighter credit conditions and a decline in consumer spending that could lead to a “mild” recession within the next year. While the immediate impact of Fitch’s downgrade on the sale and creation of U.S. Treasuries is minimal, it could eventually instill fear among investors that the federal government may default on its debts. This would compel the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates to attract cautious buyers, raising borrowing costs nationwide.

However, many experts, including former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers and Mohamed El-Erian, president of Queens’ College Cambridge and economic advisor to Allianz and Gramercy, have been quick to criticize Fitch’s decision. Summers labeled the downgrade as “bizarre and inept” given the improving economic data, such as low unemployment figures and steady GDP growth. El-Erian questioned the timing of the downgrade, pointing out that Fitch did not present any new information that would warrant a change in rating since May. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen also joined in, calling the downgrade “arbitrary” and emphasizing that U.S. Treasury securities remain the world’s pre-eminent safe and liquid asset.

The market response to Fitch’s announcement was initially negative, with the S&P 500 falling 1.38% and the Nasdaq Composite dropping 2.17%. However, prominent ANBLEs and strategists on Wall Street remain unfazed. Goldman Sachs’ chief U.S. political ANBLE, Alec Phillips, believes the downgrade has little direct impact on financial markets and does not reflect new fiscal information. Lauren DiCola, director of investment strategy and market research at Certuity, echoes this sentiment, stating that the downgrade is unlikely to discourage buyers of Treasurys or result in forced selling.

• Wells Fargo Active Cash® Card offers 2% cash back on all purchases ...
• A replacement has been named for Anthony Fauci, the top U.S. infect...
• Ferrari raises year forecasts after Q2 results, but investors are n...

Nevertheless, DiCola acknowledges that the downgrade highlights the perennial issue of the U.S.’s affinity for deficit spending. Some market strategists share the concerns raised by Fitch. Quincy Krosby, LPL Financial’s chief global strategist, warns that if the deficit continues to grow unchecked, it may lead to higher taxes and reduced discretionary income for consumers. Furthermore, as the U.S. government accumulates more debt, U.S. Treasury yields may need to rise sharply to attract investors willing to take on increased risk. This would create direct competition with the equity market, potentially impacting its performance.

In conclusion, Fitch’s downgrade of U.S. government debt reflects the nation’s expected fiscal challenges, growing debt burden, and governance issues. While the immediate implications are limited, the downgrade raises concerns about the country’s fiscal management and long-term economic viability. Criticism of Fitch’s decision has also emerged, with many experts asserting that the U.S. economy is stronger than suggested. The market initially reacted negatively but quickly regained composure, as prominent Wall Street figures remain unperturbed. Regardless, the downgrade serves as a reminder of the U.S.’s ongoing struggle to curtail deficit spending and highlights potential consequences such as higher taxes and increased borrowing costs.